The Atomic Components of Thought¶
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The Atomic Components of Thought.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Attentional Capacity
- None of these substrates has a nervous system, and yet the same five-role structure does the explanatory work, a transfer Anderson and Lebiere (1998) anticipate in their ACT-R production architecture where module-level capacity constraints generate the same exceedance signatures across cognitive and engineered substrates.
This sourceLawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 9780805828177. ACT-R cognitive architecture: module-level capacity constraints (declarative, procedural, goal, perceptual-motor) generate exceedance signatures across cognitive and engineered substrates.
- None of these substrates has a nervous system, and yet the same five-role structure does the explanatory work, a transfer Anderson and Lebiere (1998) anticipate in their ACT-R production architecture where module-level capacity constraints generate the same exceedance signatures across cognitive and engineered substrates.
- Chunking
- Every item of the structural signature is operative and the experiment isolates the chunking mechanism cleanly. Non-cognitive-psychology, structurally faithful (applied/industry).
This sourceLawrence Erlbaum Associates. ACT-R cognitive architecture with module-level capacity constraints, formalising how declarative units (chunks) and productions are encoded, retrieved, and learned.
- Every item of the structural signature is operative and the experiment isolates the chunking mechanism cleanly. Non-cognitive-psychology, structurally faithful (applied/industry).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:6d01875d5fd0 · see in the full table