Risk Management in a Dynamic Society¶
Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modelling Problem. Safety Science, 27(2), 2-3.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Coupling
- Distinguish coupling from
feedback. Not correlation. Correlation between observed variables can arise from common cause, spurious coincidence, or actual coupling; calling any correlated variables "coupled" without mechanism-level evidence is the classic failure modeThis sourceTreats risk as a cross-level control problem demanding mechanism-level (functional) models rather than surface decomposition or correlation; supports the not-correlation claim (coupling requires an identified channel, not mere covariation).
- Distinguish coupling from
- Normalization of Deviance
- Second, the rate of drift is bounded strictly by the frequency of catastrophic feedback; if the system has long latencies between deviation and failure, because the deviation is necessary-but-not-sufficient for harm, the drift can run for years before colliding with the real envelope.
This sourceModels how socio-technical systems migrate toward the boundary of safe operation under efficiency and least-effort gradients, with the drift surfacing as an accident only when the (often irreversibly crossed) boundary is reached; supports the claim that drift rate is governed by how often and how quickly catastrophic feedback arrives.
- Second, the rate of drift is bounded strictly by the frequency of catastrophic feedback; if the system has long latencies between deviation and failure, because the deviation is necessary-but-not-sufficient for harm, the drift can run for years before colliding with the real envelope.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:6d473df91335 · see in the full table