Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association¶
Supreme Court of the United States. (2015). Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Consultation Process
- Notice-and-comment procedures in public rulemaking exist precisely to guard against this by obliging decision-makers to respond to significant comments
This sourceRequires agencies to consider and respond to significant public comments.
- Notice-and-comment procedures in public rulemaking exist precisely to guard against this by obliging decision-makers to respond to significant comments
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:6e2b739f7694 · see in the full table