SPIKES—A Six-Step Protocol for Delivering Bad News: Application to the Patient with Cancer¶
Baile, W. F., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., Glober, G., Beale, E. A., & Kudelka, A. P. (2000). SPIKES—A Six-Step Protocol for Delivering Bad News: Application to the Patient with Cancer: Application to the Patient with Cancer. The Oncologist.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Interpersonal Communication
- Therapy and counseling — Rogerian active listening, motivational interviewing, and family therapy, where the relational layer and repair work are the explicit object. Healthcare provider-patient communication — shared decision-making, breaking bad news (the SPIKES protocol), and informed consent, multi-channel and relationally embedded
This sourceThe source of the SPIKES protocol, whose final step also assigns shared responsibility for treatment decisions to the patient; informed consent is outside its scope. The training protocol behind the described practice: assess the patient's perception first, deliver knowledge in small increments with comprehension checks, and answer emotion with an empathic response before returning to information.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Therapy and counseling — Rogerian active listening, motivational interviewing, and family therapy, where the relational layer and repair work are the explicit object. Healthcare provider-patient communication — shared decision-making, breaking bad news (the SPIKES protocol), and informed consent, multi-channel and relationally embedded
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:70e6a4b1abe0 · see in the full table