OBO Foundry in 2021¶
Jackson, R., Matentzoglu, N., Overton, J. A., Vita, R., Balhoff, J. P., Buttigieg, P. L., Carbon, S., et al. (2021). OBO Foundry in 2021: operationalizing open data principles to evaluate ontologies. Database.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Textual Definition
- OBO Foundry Principle FP-006 codifies these commitments for biomedical ontologies: every term must have a textual definition, the definition must follow genus-differentia style, and a definition-source relation must record who wrote it and from what authority.
This sourceThe OBO Foundry's formalized textual-definitions principle (FP-006), whose automated check requires all terms to carry distinct textual definitions.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“The ontology has textual definitions for the majority of its classes and for top-level terms in particular.”
- OBO Foundry Principle FP-006 codifies these commitments for biomedical ontologies: every term must have a textual definition, the definition must follow genus-differentia style, and a definition-source relation must record who wrote it and from what authority.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:718a3b5a8679 · see in the full table