Lord's Paradox Revisited — (Oh Lord! Kumbaya!)¶
Pearl, J. (2016). Lord's Paradox Revisited — (Oh Lord! Kumbaya!). Journal of Causal Inference.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Lord's Paradox
- The resolution, developed rigorously by Pearl (2016) and earlier by Holland and Rubin (1983), is that the two analyses answer different causal questions, and which question is the right one depends on the causal structure of the problem — specifically, on whether baseline values are themselves caused by group membership or are independent of it
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“The purpose of this paper is to trace back Lord’s paradox from its original formulation, resolve it using modern tools of causal analysis, explain why it resisted prior attempts at resolution”
- The resolution, developed rigorously by Pearl (2016) and earlier by Holland and Rubin (1983), is that the two analyses answer different causal questions, and which question is the right one depends on the causal structure of the problem — specifically, on whether baseline values are themselves caused by group membership or are independent of it
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:71eb2b76b6f6 · see in the full table