Verbal Protocols of Reading¶
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Cognitive Apprenticeship
- However, expertise is substantially tacit—experts often cannot accurately describe their own processes (the expert-introspection gap documented in Ericsson and Simon on verbal-report validity, and further synthesized for reading by Pressley and Afflerbach (1995) in Verbal Protocols of Reading), and what they articulate may systematically diverge from what they actually do.
This sourceLawrence Erlbaum Associates. Synthesis of think-aloud studies of expert reading documenting both the richness and the methodological limits of verbal-report validity — supports the expert-articulation-gap tension at D48-012. Verified existing and supporting.
- However, expertise is substantially tacit—experts often cannot accurately describe their own processes (the expert-introspection gap documented in Ericsson and Simon on verbal-report validity, and further synthesized for reading by Pressley and Afflerbach (1995) in Verbal Protocols of Reading), and what they articulate may systematically diverge from what they actually do.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:72c0e4d2523c · see in the full table