Fed. R. Evid. 607, 608, 609, 613¶
Fed. R. Evid. 607, 608, 609, 613: impeachment of witnesses; character for truthfulness; impeachment by prior conviction; prior inconsistent statements.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Ad Hominem
- Legal advocacy. Cross-examination routinely attacks a witness's credibility — prior inconsistent statements, motive to lie, bias
This source607, 608, 609, 613 (impeachment of witnesses; character for truthfulness; impeachment by prior conviction; prior inconsistent statements). The rules authorising routine credibility attack on a witness - any party may impeach (607), by character for truthfulness (608), prior conviction (609) and prior inconsistent statement (613); impeachment for bias or motive is not codified here and rests on the common law (United States v. Abel, 469 U.S. 45 (1984)).
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Legal advocacy. Cross-examination routinely attacks a witness's credibility — prior inconsistent statements, motive to lie, bias
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:730a838944ae · see in the full table