Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others¶
Constitutional Court of South Africa. (2000). Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Negative and Positive Rights
- These are not mutually exclusive species of whole rights: one housing or education right can have both aspects, borne by different actors and assessed under different conditions.
This sourceOriginal judgment inspected for section 26's non-impairment and reasonable-measures duties; it does not order an unconditional house for every claimant.
- These are not mutually exclusive species of whole rights: one housing or education right can have both aspects, borne by different actors and assessed under different conditions.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:7367bb57f811 · see in the full table