one-in, one-out¶
UK's, T. (2011). one-in, one-out.
Retired. This entry was not a citation. Our extractor stored an inline prose definition from the article as though it were a bibliographic record, so its title is the name of a concept rather than of a published work. The page is kept because links to it still resolve, but it is withdrawn from the reference list. This entry is kept so the citations that pointed at it still resolve, and so the correction is visible rather than silent.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- One-In/One-Out or Cap Rule
- Its failure mode is that the equivalence metric is gameable: pair a real new tooth with the removal of a dead-letter one that cost nothing, and the rule is satisfied while burden still grows.
This sourceA recurring critique of all of them is offset gaming — satisfying the ratio by retiring low-cost or already-dead rules — which is why the equivalence metric, not the ratio, is the load-bearing design choice.
- Its failure mode is that the equivalence metric is gameable: pair a real new tooth with the removal of a dead-letter one that cost nothing, and the rule is satisfied while burden still grows.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:73c81a86b94a · see in the full table