Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation.¶
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5-34.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Accommodation
- Accommodation preserves distinction while allowing coexistence; assimilation erases distinction through incorporation, a separation Berry (1997) formalizes in his fourfold acculturation framework where integration (mutual accommodation) and assimilation are distinct strategies.
This sourceBidimensional fourfold acculturation framework (integration, assimilation, separation, marginalization).
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Berry's own abstract confirms a conceptual acculturation-and-adaptation framework and a pluralist/integrationist orientation, but neither names the fourfold taxonomy nor states that integration and assimilation are distinct strategies.
“This article outlines a conceptual framework within which acculturation and adaptation can be investigated, and then presents some general findings and conclusions based on a sample of empirical studies.”
- Accommodation preserves distinction while allowing coexistence; assimilation erases distinction through incorporation, a separation Berry (1997) formalizes in his fourfold acculturation framework where integration (mutual accommodation) and assimilation are distinct strategies.
- Cultural Friction
- The friction generates resistance, adaptation demands, and negotiation about what aspects of the new are adopted, modified, or rejected, a process Berry (1997) formalizes in his framework of acculturation strategies (integration, assimilation, separation, marginalization).
This sourceFoundational acculturation framework: outcomes when groups encounter another culture follow four strategies (integration, assimilation, separation, marginalization) determined by attitudes toward cultural maintenance and contact, generating predictable friction patterns.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Berry's own abstract confirms only a general conceptual framework for acculturation and adaptation; it names none of the four strategies and says nothing about friction or resistance.
“This article outlines a conceptual framework within which acculturation and adaptation can be investigated, and then presents some general findings and conclusions based on a sample of empirical studies.”
- The friction generates resistance, adaptation demands, and negotiation about what aspects of the new are adopted, modified, or rejected, a process Berry (1997) formalizes in his framework of acculturation strategies (integration, assimilation, separation, marginalization).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:74ea68ab2a4a · see in the full table