Surge Capacity Logistics¶
Einav, S., Hick, J. L., & Hanfling, D. (2014). Surge Capacity Logistics: Care of the Critically Ill and Injured During Pandemics and Disasters: CHEST Consensus Statement. Chest.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Resource-Typing Mismatch
- Wildfire / flood rescue (canonical) — a request for "swift-water rescue teams" delivers a mix of boat-certified night-rescue teams, shore-based throw-bag teams, a dive team, and a basic water-rescue team, so the highest-risk sectors cannot be covered until specifically-typed teams arrive. Hospital surge staffing — a request for "ICU nurses" returns mixed subspecialties (medical-surgical, cardiac, neuro, neonatal), most unable to staff the specific surge population such as ARDS adults
This sourceThe CHEST mass-critical-care surge-logistics statement's staffing guidance, which matches staff capability to the surge population by tiered teams and by off-loading tasks to noncritical-care-trained nurses.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“strategies such as the use of care teams with noncritical care trained nurses off-loading tasks within their skill set from the critical care nurses should be used to mitigate the potential for harm.”
- Wildfire / flood rescue (canonical) — a request for "swift-water rescue teams" delivers a mix of boat-certified night-rescue teams, shore-based throw-bag teams, a dive team, and a basic water-rescue team, so the highest-risk sectors cannot be covered until specifically-typed teams arrive. Hospital surge staffing — a request for "ICU nurses" returns mixed subspecialties (medical-surgical, cardiac, neuro, neonatal), most unable to staff the specific surge population such as ARDS adults
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:74f5e68637d8 · see in the full table