Tacit and Explicit Knowledge¶
Collins, H. M. (2010). Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Implicit Knowledge
- a spectrum along which knowledge can be made more or less explicit, with limits determined by cognitive architecture and the nature of the skill — and the know-how vs know-that distinction
This sourceCollins tacit and explicit knowledge know-how distinction relational somatic.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The fetched page confirms the book's subject is the tacit/explicit knowledge divide and the limits of what can be told, but it states no conversion gradient, no cognitive-architecture limits, and no know-how/know-that distinction.
“In Tacit and Explicit Knowledge, Collins develops a common conceptual language to bridge the concept’s disparate domains by explaining explicit knowledge and classifying tacit knowledge.”
- a spectrum along which knowledge can be made more or less explicit, with limits determined by cognitive architecture and the nature of the skill — and the know-how vs know-that distinction
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:753ed8d8a3b9 · see in the full table