Broken Promises of Privacy¶
Ohm, P. (2006). Broken Promises of Privacy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1-12.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Auxiliary-Prior Review Workshop
- Its central weakness is that no room can enumerate every prior: the auxiliary information an adversary might hold is effectively unbounded, which is exactly why guarantees that hold regardless of background knowledge exist as a stronger alternative to reasoning about specific priors.
This sourceMotivates differential privacy as a guarantee designed to remain meaningful despite arbitrary auxiliary information held by an adversary.
- Its central weakness is that no room can enumerate every prior: the auxiliary information an adversary might hold is effectively unbounded, which is exactly why guarantees that hold regardless of background knowledge exist as a stronger alternative to reasoning about specific priors.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:75d96fb92e76 · see in the full table