The Rejection of Continental Drift¶
Oreskes. (1999). The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American Earth Science. Oxford University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Continental Drift
- The hypothesis was controversial for decades because Wegener could not identify a convincing mechanism
This sourceThe history of the decades-long American rejection of drift, which argues that it turned on methodological standards of evidence rather than on the missing mechanism.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- The hypothesis was controversial for decades because Wegener could not identify a convincing mechanism
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:76215f26906c · see in the full table