On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning¶
Evans, Barston, & Pollard. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Belief Bias
- Evans, Barston, and Pollard (1983) established the canonical paradigm and demonstrated the 2×2 factorial signature
This sourceThe paper's worked example of a valid syllogism with an unbelievable conclusion ('No addictive things are inexpensive ... some cigarettes are not addictive'). Evans, Barston and Pollard's experiments, which locate the belief-by-logic interaction in the two conditions where logic and belief conflict, accuracy being 87% when they agree and 48% when they do not.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“J. St. B. T. EVANS, JULIE L. BARSTON, and PAUL POLLARD”
- Evans, Barston, and Pollard (1983) established the canonical paradigm and demonstrated the 2×2 factorial signature
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:76531583ab6a · see in the full table