How Judges Think¶
Posner, R. A. (2008). How Judges Think. Harvard University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Adjudication (Dispute Resolution)
- Consider a patent infringement dispute in federal court, the kind of complex civil case Posner (2008) drew on to argue that judges combine legalist rule-application with pragmatic fact-finding and policy judgment in ways no algorithmic checklist can capture.
This sourceArgues judges combine legalist rule-application with pragmatic policy judgment, especially in indeterminate cases where formalism underdetermines outcomes — supports the patent-litigation example (D49-008).
- Consider a patent infringement dispute in federal court, the kind of complex civil case Posner (2008) drew on to argue that judges combine legalist rule-application with pragmatic fact-finding and policy judgment in ways no algorithmic checklist can capture.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:767333e4e058 · see in the full table