Surfaces and Essences¶
Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. Basic Books.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Analogy
- T6 — Generative versus convergent analogy. Some analogies open up new exploration spaces and invite multiple alternative framings of a problem (suggestive, productive analogies); others impose structure so forcefully that they lock reasoning into a single trajectory and suppress competing interpretations.
This sourceArgues that the same mapping-across-domains structure underlies word use, scientific conceptualization, and everyday categorization; treats translation-style analogical mapping as the core engine of cognition.
- T6 — Generative versus convergent analogy. Some analogies open up new exploration spaces and invite multiple alternative framings of a problem (suggestive, productive analogies); others impose structure so forcefully that they lock reasoning into a single trajectory and suppress competing interpretations.
- Comparison
- Hofstadter and Sander's (2013) treatment of analogy as the core of cognition argues that even the most rhetorical-seeming comparisons run on the same dimension-selection and alignment machinery as scientific ones, with the output relation simply weighted toward expressive resonance rather than truth-preservation.
This sourceArgues that the same cross-domain mapping structure underlies word use, scientific conceptualization, and everyday categorization — supports the claim that even rhetorical comparisons run on the same dimension-selection and alignment machinery as scientific ones.
- Hofstadter and Sander's (2013) treatment of analogy as the core of cognition argues that even the most rhetorical-seeming comparisons run on the same dimension-selection and alignment machinery as scientific ones, with the output relation simply weighted toward expressive resonance rather than truth-preservation.
- Translation and Conceptual Bridging
- The structural insight transfers cleanly: a word, a scientific principle, an organizational practice, a legal concept, and a cultural norm all exhibit the same mapping-across-incommensurable-space logic, a generality Hofstadter and Sander (2013) treat as the core engine of cognition.
This sourceArgues that the same mapping-across-domains structure underlies word use, scientific conceptualization, and everyday categorization; treats translation-style analogical mapping as the core engine of cognition.
- The structural insight transfers cleanly: a word, a scientific principle, an organizational practice, a legal concept, and a cultural norm all exhibit the same mapping-across-incommensurable-space logic, a generality Hofstadter and Sander (2013) treat as the core engine of cognition.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:768b66094421 · see in the full table