Surfaces and Essences¶
Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. Basic Books.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Analogy
- T6 — Generative versus convergent analogy. Some analogies open up new exploration spaces and invite multiple alternative framings of a problem (suggestive, productive analogies); others impose structure so forcefully that they lock reasoning into a single trajectory and suppress competing interpretations.
This sourceArgues that the same mapping-across-domains structure underlies word use, scientific conceptualization, and everyday categorization; treats translation-style analogical mapping as the core engine of cognition.
- T6 — Generative versus convergent analogy. Some analogies open up new exploration spaces and invite multiple alternative framings of a problem (suggestive, productive analogies); others impose structure so forcefully that they lock reasoning into a single trajectory and suppress competing interpretations.
- Comparison
- Hofstadter and Sander's (2013) treatment of analogy as the core of cognition argues that even the most rhetorical-seeming comparisons run on the same dimension-selection and alignment machinery as scientific ones, with the output relation simply weighted toward expressive resonance rather than truth-preservation.
This sourceArgues that the same cross-domain mapping structure underlies word use, scientific conceptualization, and everyday categorization — supports the claim that even rhetorical comparisons run on the same dimension-selection and alignment machinery as scientific ones.
- Hofstadter and Sander's (2013) treatment of analogy as the core of cognition argues that even the most rhetorical-seeming comparisons run on the same dimension-selection and alignment machinery as scientific ones, with the output relation simply weighted toward expressive resonance rather than truth-preservation.
- Translation and Conceptual Bridging
- The structural insight transfers cleanly: a word, a scientific principle, an organizational practice, a legal concept, and a cultural norm all exhibit the same mapping-across-incommensurable-space logic, a generality Hofstadter and Sander (2013) treat as the core engine of cognition.
This sourceArgues that the same mapping-across-domains structure underlies word use, scientific conceptualization, and everyday categorization; treats translation-style analogical mapping as the core engine of cognition.
- The structural insight transfers cleanly: a word, a scientific principle, an organizational practice, a legal concept, and a cultural norm all exhibit the same mapping-across-incommensurable-space logic, a generality Hofstadter and Sander (2013) treat as the core engine of cognition.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:768b66094421 · see in the full table