Diversity and Complexity¶
Page, S. E. (2010). Diversity and Complexity. Princeton University Press.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Complexity
- Page (2010) argued that diversity of traders, strategies, and models increases market complexity and can improve collective outcomes (prediction, innovation) but also risks instability and unpredictability
This sourceRole of diversity in complex adaptive systems; diversity of types, strategies, and interaction structures shapes complexity, robustness, and collective outcomes — supports the market-diversity claim at D26-082. Verified existing and supporting.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Princeton's description of Page's book backs the general frame — diversity drives performance in complex adaptive systems — but says nothing about traders, markets, prediction, innovation, or instability.
“In complex adaptive systems, diversity makes fundamental contributions to system performance.”
- Page (2010) argued that diversity of traders, strategies, and models increases market complexity and can improve collective outcomes (prediction, innovation) but also risks instability and unpredictability
- Optionality
- An investor familiar with Black-Scholes might recognize the same structure in a company's strategic optionality (forward deployments, alliances, technology bets); a biologist familiar with developmental plasticity might see the parallel to strategic flexibility in organizations; a software architect familiar with API versioning might see the parallel to career optionality through skill diversification—the kind of cross-domain pattern transfer Page (2010) catalogues in his analysis of diversity and complexity.
This sourceCatalogs the cross-domain portability of division-of-labor and diversity arguments, showing the productivity and robustness consequences of functional differentiation recur as a general property of complex adaptive systems.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Page's publisher describes the book as showing diversity's role in complex adaptive systems across domains, backing the cross-domain frame but not the optionality analogies.
“Diversity plays a different role in a complex system than it does in an equilibrium system, where it often merely produces variation around the mean for performance measures. In complex adaptive systems, diversity makes fundamental contributions to system performance.”
- An investor familiar with Black-Scholes might recognize the same structure in a company's strategic optionality (forward deployments, alliances, technology bets); a biologist familiar with developmental plasticity might see the parallel to strategic flexibility in organizations; a software architect familiar with API versioning might see the parallel to career optionality through skill diversification—the kind of cross-domain pattern transfer Page (2010) catalogues in his analysis of diversity and complexity.
- Specialization
- Page (2010) catalogs exactly this kind of cross-domain portability for division-of-labor and diversity arguments, showing that the productivity and robustness consequences of functional differentiation recur as a general property of complex adaptive systems rather than as a fact about any one field.
This sourceCatalogs the cross-domain portability of division-of-labor and diversity arguments, showing the productivity and robustness consequences of functional differentiation recur as a general property of complex adaptive systems.
- Page (2010) catalogs exactly this kind of cross-domain portability for division-of-labor and diversity arguments, showing that the productivity and robustness consequences of functional differentiation recur as a general property of complex adaptive systems rather than as a fact about any one field.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 3 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:76b0d2237882 · see in the full table