Recherches sur la théorie des quanta

de Broglie, L. (1924). Recherches sur la théorie des quanta. PhD thesis, University of Paris.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

1924

Link

https://archive.org/details/de-broglie-louis-recherches-sur-la-theorie-des-quanta-1924 not authoritativefound

Cited from

mathematics, physics

Cited by

4 citations across 4 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Discrete vs. Continuous (Quantization)
  • Foundations span quantum mechanics (Planck 1900, Einstein 1905, Bohr 1913, de Broglie 1924

    This sourceProposes that matter (electrons, particles) exhibit wave properties; derives de Broglie wavelength λ = h/p; initiates wave-particle duality as a fundamental quantum principle.

• Duality
  • … in one vocabulary (∧, ∀) translate mechanically to the other (∨, ∃) via De Morgan's laws, topological and algebraic categories (Boolean algebras ↔ Stone spaces, locally-compact groups ↔ character groups) pair up so that problems in one setting resolve via the other, and physics dualities (Fourier, wave-particle

    This sourceProposes that matter (electrons, particles) exhibit wave properties; derives de Broglie wavelength λ = h/p; initiates wave-particle duality as a fundamental quantum principle.

• Wave
  • De Broglie's 1924 hypothesis postulated matter waves

    This sourceProposes that matter (electrons, particles) exhibit wave properties; derives de Broglie wavelength λ = h/p; initiates wave-particle duality as a fundamental quantum principle.

• Wave-Particle Duality
  • The physical situation is more accurately described as: quantum entities are neither classical waves nor classical particles but a distinct kind of object whose behavior includes wave-like and particle-like aspects in complementary experimental contexts.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:785ddc6540b5 · see in the full table