Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co., 365 U.S. 320¶
Supreme Court of the United States. (1961). Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co., 365 U.S. 320. United States Reports.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Exclusive Channel Agreement
- Aggressive exclusivity on a channel where you hold real market power can also cross into antitrust foreclosure.
This sourceExplains that exclusive dealing can violate Clayton Act section 3 when its probable effect is to foreclose competition in a substantial share of the relevant market, with the parties’ relative strength among the considerations.
- Aggressive exclusivity on a channel where you hold real market power can also cross into antitrust foreclosure.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:79254eda4d51 · see in the full table