GRADE: An Emerging Consensus on Rating Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations.¶
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: An Emerging Consensus on Rating Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924-926.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Confidence Annotation
- A clinical-practice guideline pairing each recommendation with a strength-of-recommendation grade and a quality-of-evidence rating (as in the GRADE system) is the applied instance that exhibits every slot and shows the cross-domain transfer the prime predicts.
This sourceEstablishes the GRADE scales — strong/weak recommendations and high/moderate/low/very-low evidence quality — and the consumer contract for each.
- A clinical-practice guideline pairing each recommendation with a strength-of-recommendation grade and a quality-of-evidence rating (as in the GRADE system) is the applied instance that exhibits every slot and shows the cross-domain transfer the prime predicts.
- Garbage In, Garbage Out
- In statistics and meta-analysis, a synthesis inherits the bias of its primary studies, which is why evidence-rating frameworks grade the underlying trials.
This sourceEvidence-rating framework grading a synthesis by the quality and risk of bias of its underlying primary trials.
- In statistics and meta-analysis, a synthesis inherits the bias of its primary studies, which is why evidence-rating frameworks grade the underlying trials.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:79f82ac7de7a · see in the full table