The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller¶
Ginzburg, C. (1976). The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller: il cosmo di un mugnaio del '500.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Anachronism
- By providing a vocabulary for period-bound elements that have traveled outside their native period, anachronism analysis—as Ginzburg (1976) showed in The Cheese and the Worms—allows systematic detection of interpretive errors that would otherwise manifest as diffuse "something's off."
This sourceMicrohistory reconstructing a single miller's mental world from trial records without projecting modern categories — supports the systematic-detection-of-interpretive-error claim (D40-066).
- By providing a vocabulary for period-bound elements that have traveled outside their native period, anachronism analysis—as Ginzburg (1976) showed in The Cheese and the Worms—allows systematic detection of interpretive errors that would otherwise manifest as diffuse "something's off."
- Microhistory vs. Macrohistory
- Microhistory vs. Macrohistory is the scale-of-analysis dimension in historical inquiry along which (1) microhistory, exemplified by Ginzburg (1976), studies a small, bounded subject (a village, a single trial, one household, a short span) in high-resolution detail, drawing on the dense texture of local evidence to reveal structure not visible at larger scales,
This sourceFoundational microhistory text: intensive archival reconstruction of a single trial to reveal popular mentality without projecting modern categories.
- Microhistory vs. Macrohistory is the scale-of-analysis dimension in historical inquiry along which (1) microhistory, exemplified by Ginzburg (1976), studies a small, bounded subject (a village, a single trial, one household, a short span) in high-resolution detail, drawing on the dense texture of local evidence to reveal structure not visible at larger scales,
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:7a63ae90b173 · see in the full table