Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)

Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., & Masinter, L. (2005). Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax.

Type

Report

Intellectual base

Grey literature

Year

2005

DOI

10.17487/rfc3986

DOI registrant

RFC Editor

Link

https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC3986

Cited from

biology_ecology

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Naming Convention
  • The programming idea that a namespace equals an authority domain ports to identifier design in linked data, where identifiers are by convention rooted in the publishing organization's domain to assert authority and prevent collision.

    This sourceDefines URI/URL syntax and the convention of rooting identifiers in the publishing organization's DNS domain to assert authority and avoid collision — namespace-as-authority-domain.

    Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

    RFC 3986 supports naming-authority delegation and reuse of DNS domain registration for globally unique names; it does not mention linked data or programming namespaces.

    “Many URI schemes include a hierarchical element for a naming authority so that governance of the name space defined by the remainder of the URI is delegated to that authority”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Domain-specific

• Uniform Resource Identifier
  • RFC 3986 defines a federated, extensible identification system: the scheme names the governing specification, while authority, path, query, and fragment components have generic roles whose detailed interpretation depends on the scheme, naming authority, and possibly the media type of a retrieved representation.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.

• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986.html ×1

Registry ID ref:7a858895d381 · see in the full table