A and B v. Norway

ECtHR. (2016). A and B v. Norway.

Type

Court case

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2016

Link

https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Domain-specific

• Non Bis in Idem
  • Parallel proceedings may count as a coherent integrated response rather than prohibited duplication only under tightly defined substantive, temporal, foreseeability, and proportionality conditions.

Verification

This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:7a9c9e7e1a0a · see in the full table