Peer review

Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178-182.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2006

Link

no authoritative link yet

Cited from

engineering_design

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Quality Control
  • This pattern mirrors Smith's (2006) account of peer review as a flawed but persistent quality-control mechanism whose performance is itself routinely audited.

    This sourceInfluential editorial documenting peer review as a human-judgment quality-control mechanism whose performance metrics (acceptance rates, reviewer agreement, retraction trends) follow the same structural loop as manufacturing QC.

Verification

This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:7b506b07cd2e · see in the full table