Did Ralph Nader Spoil Al Gore’s Presidential Bid? A Ballot-Level Study of Green and Reform Party Voters in the 2000 Presidential Election¶
Herron, & Lewis. (2000). Did Ralph Nader Spoil Al Gore’s Presidential Bid? A Ballot-Level Study of Green and Reform Party Voters in the 2000 Presidential Election. Quarterly Journal of Political Science.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Arrow's Impossibility Theorem
- Ralph Nader, a third-party candidate with no chance of winning, drew votes disproportionately from Al Gore; his presence plausibly flipped the Bush-versus-Gore outcome in a decisive state
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“we show that at least 40% of Nader voters in the key state of Florida would have voted for Bush, as opposed to Gore, had they turned out in a Naderless election”
- Ralph Nader, a third-party candidate with no chance of winning, drew votes disproportionately from Al Gore; his presence plausibly flipped the Bush-versus-Gore outcome in a decisive state
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:7ba610301c47 · see in the full table