A Systematic Theory of Argumentation¶
Eemeren, F. H. v., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Decision Cycle Subordination
- In debate and negotiation, controlling topic rotation forces the other into reactive defense, and reframing is the recovery.
This sourceTreats argumentative discourse as a critical discussion in which controlling the framing, the agenda of disputed standpoints, and the burden of proof governs who is forced onto reactive defense — the argumentation/negotiation instance of tempo and reframing.
- In debate and negotiation, controlling topic rotation forces the other into reactive defense, and reframing is the recovery.
- Dialectic
- Turn-taking follows a patterned protocol — question-and-answer, proposition-and-objection, response-and-counter — rather than parallel monologues; the pattern is recursively applied to successively refined claims
This sourceModels argumentation as a rule-governed 'critical discussion' with confrontation/opening/argumentation/concluding stages; supports the patterned question-answer-clarification protocol (187).
- Turn-taking follows a patterned protocol — question-and-answer, proposition-and-objection, response-and-counter — rather than parallel monologues; the pattern is recursively applied to successively refined claims
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:7d953eea0efc · see in the full table