'Necessary and sufficient' in biology is not necessarily necessary. Confusions and erroneous conclusions resulting from Misapplied logic in the field of biology, especially neuroscience.¶
Yoshihara, M., & Yoshihara, M. (2018). 'Necessary and sufficient' in biology is not necessarily necessary. Confusions and erroneous conclusions resulting from Misapplied logic in the field of biology, especially neuroscience. Journal of Neurogenetics, 32(2), 53-64.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Biological Tests of Necessity and Sufficiency
- Yoshihara and Yoshihara's methodological critique emphasizes this mismatch; it is an argument about interpretation, rather than another experimental demonstration or a rule that every intervention study is invalid.
This sourceThis is an attributed methodological argument, not an additional experimental case or field-consensus ruling.
- Yoshihara and Yoshihara's methodological critique emphasizes this mismatch; it is an argument about interpretation, rather than another experimental demonstration or a rule that every intervention study is invalid.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:7dbf6e6b84b2 · see in the full table