The interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis

Bayarri, M. J., & Berger, J. O. (2004). The interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis. Statistical Science, 19(1), 58-80.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2004

Volume

19

Issue

1

Pages

58-80

DOI registrant

Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Link

https://doi.org/10.1214/088342304000000116matched

Cited from

statistics_experimental_design

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Statistical Inference
  • T1: Frequentist and Bayesian framings encode fundamentally different commitments about probability, a divide Bayarri and Berger (2004) survey in their analysis of the interplay between the two paradigms.

    This sourceSurvey of the conceptual divide and practical interplay between Bayesian and frequentist inference: clarifies that the two paradigms encode fundamentally different commitments about what probability means and how it licenses inference.

    Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

    The abstract confirms that fundamental philosophical issues divide the two paradigms, but it does not state that they encode different commitments about what probability means; only the abstract was readable.

    “since there are fundamental philosophical and pedagogical issues at stake”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:7e99e7ae82b6 · see in the full table