Skip to content

Gradual or pulsed evolution: when should punctuational explanations be preferred?

The study found that the G. tumida lineage, w. r. i. r. s. o. a. c. p. o. i. t. d. u. p. Gradual or pulsed evolution: when should punctuational explanations be preferred?.

Type
Unclassified
Intellectual base
Unclassified
Link
no authoritative link yet

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Domain-specific

  • Punctuated gradualism
    • High-level evolutionary hypothesis only; no organism manipulation, field intervention or laboratory procedure is provided.

      This sourceBased on these findings, Malmgren and colleagues introduced a new mode of evolution and proposed to call it "punctuated gradualism." There is strong evidence supporting both gradual evolution of a species over time and rapid events of species evolution separated by periods of little evolutionary change. Organisms have a great propensity to adapt and evolve depending on the circumstances. ==Studies== Studies use evidence to predict how organisms evolved in the past and apply this evidence to the present. Both models of evolution can not only be seen between species, but also within a species. This is shown in a study done on the body size evolution in the radiolarian Pseudocubus vema. Hunt, G. (2008). Gradual or pulsed evolution: when should punctuational explanations be preferred?. Paleobiology, 34(3), 360-377.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:7edfd783f6b6 · see in the full table