Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation et al.¶
Supreme Court of the United States. (1943). Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation et al.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Gatekeeping Decision Log
- The sharpest misuse is writing the reason after the decision to rationalize it, which inverts the log's purpose; the corrective is the administrative-law principle that a decision must stand on the reasons actually given at the time
This sourceRequires an administrative decision to stand on the grounds the agency actually invoked, not a different justification supplied later.
- The sharpest misuse is writing the reason after the decision to rationalize it, which inverts the log's purpose; the corrective is the administrative-law principle that a decision must stand on the reasons actually given at the time
- Reasoned Decision Notice
- The safeguard is the principle behind the whole mechanism, the duty to give reasons: the reasons stated must be the ones the decision actually rested on
This sourceRequires administrative action to be reviewed on the reasons the decision-maker actually disclosed, not post hoc substitutes.
- The safeguard is the principle behind the whole mechanism, the duty to give reasons: the reasons stated must be the ones the decision actually rested on
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:7f2a7401fa7b · see in the full table