Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids.¶
Jersáková, J., Johnson, S. D., & Kindlmann, P. (2006). Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids. Biological Reviews, 81(2), 219-235.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Antagonist
- Software resource-handle hoarding: a process holds a file lock, database connection, or mutex acquired but does no work with it, denying others access while the resource is recognised as held. Ecology: some plant species occupy a pollinator's foraging visit without producing nectar, denying access during the visit window.
This sourceReviews food-deceptive and other non-rewarding orchid pollination: flowers occupy a pollinator's foraging visit by mimicking a reward signal while producing no nectar, denying the visit any payoff.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Abstract confirms nectarless, food-deceptive orchids attract pollinators, but not the 'occupying the visit window' mechanism or the software clause.
“The mechanisms of deception in orchids include generalized food deception, food‐deceptive floral mimicry, brood‐site imitation, shelter imitation, pseudoantagonism, rendezvous attraction and sexual deception.”
- Software resource-handle hoarding: a process holds a file lock, database connection, or mutex acquired but does no work with it, denying others access while the resource is recognised as held. Ecology: some plant species occupy a pollinator's foraging visit without producing nectar, denying access during the visit window.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:7f4fa8d56912 · see in the full table