Futures literacy¶
Miller, R. (2007). Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method. Futures, 341-362.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Futures Literacy
- Following Miller's (2007) hybrid strategic scenario method, the concept presumes (a) a learner (individual, group, or institution) capable of metacognitive reflection on anticipatory-assumption use, (b) developmental experiences that exercise the capability (not just communicate information about it), and © ongoing integration into work contexts where the capability can be exercised and refined.
This sourceOriginal articulation of futures literacy as a hybrid scenario-based capability resting on metacognitive reflection on anticipatory assumptions; supports the Structural-Signature presumptions (learner capable of metacognition, developmental experiences, ongoing integration).
- As Miller (2007) develops in his hybrid scenario method, futures literacy manages the complexity of anticipatory use by building meta-capacity: rather than providing specific methods for specific problems, it develops the capability to select, adapt, and combine methods appropriate to the work at hand.
This sourceDevelops the meta-capacity to hold multiple future-images ('anticipatory diversity') appropriate to different purposes rather than collapsing to a single image; supports the Manages-Complexity claim.
- Following Miller's (2007) hybrid strategic scenario method, the concept presumes (a) a learner (individual, group, or institution) capable of metacognitive reflection on anticipatory-assumption use, (b) developmental experiences that exercise the capability (not just communicate information about it), and © ongoing integration into work contexts where the capability can be exercised and refined.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:7f602013fa0b · see in the full table