Three Sides of Harberger Triangles¶
Hines, J. R. J. (1999). Three Sides of Harberger Triangles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(2), 167-188.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Deadweight Loss
- Historical perspective: Hines (1999)
This sourceReexamines the Harberger triangle and its history; shows the geometric framework remains valid while numerical DWL magnitudes hinge on elasticity values, data, and modeling choices.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Hines considers "the historical development of Harberger triangles, the associated theoretical controversies, and the contribution of Harberger triangles to subsequent empirical work and theories of market imperfections". A history of the triangle and of the arguments around it is the role the heading assigns to the work. The further contention that the geometric framework remains valid while numerical magnitudes hinge on elasticity values, data and modelling choices is not among the statements that back the heading.
“The first is the place of the Harberger triangle in the historical development of the theory of consumer surplus”
- Historical perspective: Hines (1999)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:7fe56dcaeeb4 · see in the full table