Futures Research Methodology — Version 3.0¶
Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2009). Futures Research Methodology — Version 3.0.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Cross-Impact Analysis
- In contemporary practice, cross-impact analysis is a recognized methodology in academic futures-studies (featured in standard references including Glenn and Gordon's Futures Research Methodology
This sourceCD-ROM/digital publication, 39 chapters covering qualitative, quantitative, and normative futures methods. Earlier versions: v1.0 (1994) and v2.0 (2003); v3.0 remains the current standard reference.
- In contemporary practice, cross-impact analysis is a recognized methodology in academic futures-studies (featured in standard references including Glenn and Gordon's Futures Research Methodology
- Future Wheel
- The future-wheel method was developed by Jerome Glenn in 1972 while at the Institute for the Future, originally published in The Futurist and elaborated in subsequent Millennium Project methodological publications including Glenn and Gordon's Futures Research Methodology (Version 3.0, 2009; updated subsequently)
- As Glenn and Gordon (2009) document in Futures Research Methodology (Version 3.0), mature practice often uses multiple smaller wheels (one per major branch) rather than a single very large wheel — effectively sharding the complexity across multiple exercises rather than expanding any single wheel past the point of cognitive-legibility.
This sourceThe standard professional reference (39 chapters); supports the mature-practice multi-wheel sharding strategy of decomposing a complex trigger across several smaller wheels rather than one illegible large one.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's ISBN resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:7ff798fe2281 · see in the full table