Cohens v. Virginia¶
U.S. Supreme Court. (1821). Cohens v. Virginia.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Obiter Dictum
- In Cohens v. Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court said that general expressions extending beyond the case may deserve respect without controlling judgment when the precise issue later arises.
This sourcePrimary judicial opinion for reading broad expressions in relation to the decided case and for respecting, without automatically following, expressions that extend beyond it.
- In Cohens v. Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court said that general expressions extending beyond the case may deserve respect without controlling judgment when the precise issue later arises.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:803836ff4213 · see in the full table