Measurement of Observer Agreement¶
Kundel, & Polansky. (2003). Measurement of Observer Agreement. Radiology.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Inter-Annotator Agreement
- . Qualitative social-science coding — two coders double-code interview transcripts and IAA establishes the scheme is reproducible before single-coder application to the full corpus. Medical imaging and diagnosis — two radiologists independently read the same scans, kappa being the standard reliability statistic for diagnostic codes
This sourceKundel and Polansky's review of chance-corrected kappa and weighted kappa as the measures of observer agreement on categorical diagnostic imaging data.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“The review concentrates on the chance-corrected indices, kappa and weighted kappa.”
- . Qualitative social-science coding — two coders double-code interview transcripts and IAA establishes the scheme is reproducible before single-coder application to the full corpus. Medical imaging and diagnosis — two radiologists independently read the same scans, kappa being the standard reliability statistic for diagnostic codes
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:80b03c2db64c · see in the full table