Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure¶
Reber, R., Schwarz, & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Mere Exposure Effect
- the perceptual fluency increase — the neural-level ease with which the stimulus is encoded and processed after repeated exposure
This sourceIntegrative review establishing that subjective ease of cognitive processing directly influences evaluative judgments, aesthetic preferences, and decision-making independent of objective stimulus content.
- the perceptual fluency increase — the neural-level ease with which the stimulus is encoded and processed after repeated exposure
- Processing Fluency
- Processing fluency is the subjective ease with which cognitive operations proceed on a stimulus, directly influencing evaluative judgments, preference formation, and decision-making independently of stimulus content or objective quality, as Reber, Schwarz, and Winkielman (2004) established in their integrative review of fluency and aesthetic pleasure.
This sourceIntegrative review establishing that subjective ease of cognitive processing directly influences evaluative judgments, aesthetic preferences, and decision-making independent of objective stimulus content.
- Processing fluency is the subjective ease with which cognitive operations proceed on a stimulus, directly influencing evaluative judgments, preference formation, and decision-making independently of stimulus content or objective quality, as Reber, Schwarz, and Winkielman (2004) established in their integrative review of fluency and aesthetic pleasure.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:814450e086b0 · see in the full table