Source Monitoring¶
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source Monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3-28.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Differential Decay
- Source-monitoring failures: the content of a memory persists while the source attribution fades, so a remembered fact is treated as known outright, uncoupled from whether it came from a friend, a dream, or a newspaper.
This sourceContent of a memory can persist while its source attribution fades, decoupling a known fact from where it came from.
- Source-monitoring failures: the content of a memory persists while the source attribution fades, so a remembered fact is treated as known outright, uncoupled from whether it came from a friend, a dream, or a newspaper.
- Reality Monitoring
Mechanisms¶
- Reality Monitoring Checklist
- The disciplines that keep it honest come straight from the underlying idea of reality monitoring:
This sourceTreats familiarity as a fallible cue in source attribution rather than conclusive proof of a memory's origin.
- The disciplines that keep it honest come straight from the underlying idea of reality monitoring:
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:81452bd7e00c · see in the full table