Role of Haptic Feedback Technologies and Novel Engineering Developments for Surgical Training and Robot-Assisted Surgery

Patel, R. V. (2025). Role of Haptic Feedback Technologies and Novel Engineering Developments for Surgical Training and Robot-Assisted Surgery. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 12.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2025

Volume

12

DOI

10.3389/frobt.2025.1567955

DOI registrant

Frontiers Media SA

Link

https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2025.1567955

Cited from

cognitive_science

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Perception Action Loop
  • Ethology and development. Predator-prey escape responses run on tightly coupled loops; infant motor exploration is perception-action learning. Surgical practice. Laparoscopy degrades performance by disrupting the natural loop; haptic feedback in tele-surgery aims to restore it.

    This sourceReviews how laparoscopy/teleoperation disrupts the surgeon's natural sensorimotor loop by removing haptic feedback, and how restoring touch in tele-surgery improves performance.

    Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

    Review documents that missing haptic feedback in laparoscopy and tele-surgery impairs surgical performance and that restoring it helps; it never frames this as a perception-action loop.

    “this may lead to longer interventions and increased risk of complications than if haptic feedback were perceived similarly to in open surgery”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:819bcf96d49d · see in the full table