Measuring Nonuse Damages Using Contingent Valuation: An Experimental Evaluation of Accuracy

Desvousges, W. H. (1992/2010). Measuring Nonuse Damages Using Contingent Valuation: An Experimental Evaluation of Accuracy: An Experimental Evaluation of Accuracy.

Type

Report

Intellectual base

Grey literature

Year

2010 this edition · first published 1992

Pages cited

92-1

Link

https://www.rti.org/rti-press-publication/measuring-nonuse-damages-using-contingent-valuation-experimental-evaluation-accuracy-2nd-ed/fulltext.pdf not authoritativefound

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Domain-specific

• Scope Neglect
  • Asked how much they would pay to save 2,000, 20,000, or 200,000 birds from oil-soaked deaths, respondents return willingness-to-pay figures statistically indistinguishable across a hundredfold range in scope

    This sourceReports the group-mean willingness-to-pay figures of roughly $80, $78 and $88 across a hundredfold scope range, with the between-condition differences not statistically distinguishable from zero.

    SupportedVerified against the source

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:823bfd55b1cc · see in the full table