Solving the equity–equality conceptual dilemma¶
Espinoza, O. (2007). Solving the equity–equality conceptual dilemma: a new model for analysis of the educational process. Educational Research, 49(4), 343-363.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Equity
- It distinguishes between (1) the rules that apply in standard cases, (2) the recognition that particular cases can differ in morally relevant ways, and (3) the mechanisms for adjusting remedy to particular fact without wholesale abandonment of rules, a conceptual disambiguation Espinoza (2007) develops in distinguishing equity from formal equality.
This sourceDisentangles equity (case-sensitive fairness taking individual circumstances into account) from formal equality (uniform treatment). (Citation-fix: the prime titles it 'Solving the equity/equality conceptual difference'; the published title uses 'dilemma'.)
- It distinguishes between (1) the rules that apply in standard cases, (2) the recognition that particular cases can differ in morally relevant ways, and (3) the mechanisms for adjusting remedy to particular fact without wholesale abandonment of rules, a conceptual disambiguation Espinoza (2007) develops in distinguishing equity from formal equality.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8257ac3e08fd · see in the full table