Foundations of Futures Studies¶
Bell, W. (1997). Foundations of Futures Studies: Human Science for a New Era. Transaction Publishers.
Cited by¶
6 citations across 6 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Causal Layered Analysis (CLA)
- Effective policy redesign addresses all layers, a multi-level orientation Bell (1997) develops as the cross-disciplinary foundation for futures-oriented policy analysis.
This sourceTwo-volume canonical text placing "images of the future" at the methodological core of futures studies and establishing futures-oriented analysis as a cross-disciplinary human science applicable to policy.
- Effective policy redesign addresses all layers, a multi-level orientation Bell (1997) develops as the cross-disciplinary foundation for futures-oriented policy analysis.
- Foresight
- A neuroscientist who understands strategic foresight can re-read predictive-coding work as another implementation of the same anticipatory pattern, as Clark (2013) and Bell (1997) each argue from their respective disciplines.
This sourceTwo-volume canonical text placing "images of the future" at the methodological core of futures studies. SUPPORTS the cross-discipline re-reading claim (162).
- A neuroscientist who understands strategic foresight can re-read predictive-coding work as another implementation of the same anticipatory pattern, as Clark (2013) and Bell (1997) each argue from their respective disciplines.
- Future Wheel
- In the absence of explicit consequence-mapping, as Bell (1997) observes in his foundational treatment of futures studies, planning and decision discussions typically focus on the one or two most-salient direct consequences, with indirect consequences entering the discussion only as anecdote or afterthought.
This sourceTwo-volume canonical futures-studies text; supports the claim that, absent explicit consequence-mapping, planning discussions fixate on a few salient direct consequences while indirect ones enter only as anecdote.
- In the absence of explicit consequence-mapping, as Bell (1997) observes in his foundational treatment of futures studies, planning and decision discussions typically focus on the one or two most-salient direct consequences, with indirect consequences entering the discussion only as anecdote or afterthought.
- Ritual
This sourceTwo-volume canonical text placing "images of the future" at the methodological core of futures studies; treats H2-style experimental probes in the present as a way of learning what the emerging system might require.
- Three Horizons Analysis
- H2 organizational activity includes the transitional experiments already underway: cross-functional teams with decision authority; agile delivery practices in some units; rapid-experimentation frameworks (OKRs, sprint-based planning); communities of practice that cut across formal structure; employee-engagement initiatives that distribute decision-making; product-thinking approaches that challenge functional silos — exactly the kind of "image-of-the-future" probes that Bell (1997) places at the methodological core of futures studies, where alternative arrangements are tested in the present as a way of learning what the emerging system might require.
This sourceTwo-volume canonical text placing "images of the future" at the methodological core of futures studies; treats H2-style experimental probes in the present as a way of learning what the emerging system might require.
- H2 organizational activity includes the transitional experiments already underway: cross-functional teams with decision authority; agile delivery practices in some units; rapid-experimentation frameworks (OKRs, sprint-based planning); communities of practice that cut across formal structure; employee-engagement initiatives that distribute decision-making; product-thinking approaches that challenge functional silos — exactly the kind of "image-of-the-future" probes that Bell (1997) places at the methodological core of futures studies, where alternative arrangements are tested in the present as a way of learning what the emerging system might require.
- Wild Cards
- Wild-card analysis is standard in governmental strategic-foresight practice, in corporate futures programs, and in risk-analysis domains where structural surprise has high cost, as Bell (1997) surveys in Foundations of Futures Studies.
This sourceTwo-volume canonical text placing "images of the future" at the methodological core of futures studies; treats H2-style experimental probes in the present as a way of learning what the emerging system might require.
- Wild-card analysis is standard in governmental strategic-foresight practice, in corporate futures programs, and in risk-analysis domains where structural surprise has high cost, as Bell (1997) surveys in Foundations of Futures Studies.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:82973fc19b18 · see in the full table