Foundations of Futures Studies¶
Bell, W. (1997). Foundations of Futures Studies: Human Science for a New Era. Transaction Publishers.
Cited by¶
6 citations across 6 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Causal Layered Analysis (CLA)
- Effective policy redesign addresses all layers, a multi-level orientation Bell (1997) develops as the cross-disciplinary foundation for futures-oriented policy analysis.
This sourceTwo-volume canonical text placing "images of the future" at the methodological core of futures studies and establishing futures-oriented analysis as a cross-disciplinary human science applicable to policy.
- Effective policy redesign addresses all layers, a multi-level orientation Bell (1997) develops as the cross-disciplinary foundation for futures-oriented policy analysis.
- Foresight
- A neuroscientist who understands strategic foresight can re-read predictive-coding work as another implementation of the same anticipatory pattern, as Clark (2013) and Bell (1997) each argue from their respective disciplines.
This sourceTwo-volume canonical text placing "images of the future" at the methodological core of futures studies. SUPPORTS the cross-discipline re-reading claim (162).
- A neuroscientist who understands strategic foresight can re-read predictive-coding work as another implementation of the same anticipatory pattern, as Clark (2013) and Bell (1997) each argue from their respective disciplines.
- Future Wheel
- In the absence of explicit consequence-mapping, as Bell (1997) observes in his foundational treatment of futures studies, planning and decision discussions typically focus on the one or two most-salient direct consequences, with indirect consequences entering the discussion only as anecdote or afterthought.
This sourceTwo-volume canonical futures-studies text; supports the claim that, absent explicit consequence-mapping, planning discussions fixate on a few salient direct consequences while indirect ones enter only as anecdote.
- In the absence of explicit consequence-mapping, as Bell (1997) observes in his foundational treatment of futures studies, planning and decision discussions typically focus on the one or two most-salient direct consequences, with indirect consequences entering the discussion only as anecdote or afterthought.
- Ritual
This sourceTwo-volume canonical text placing "images of the future" at the methodological core of futures studies; treats H2-style experimental probes in the present as a way of learning what the emerging system might require.
- Three Horizons Analysis
- H2 organizational activity includes the transitional experiments already underway: cross-functional teams with decision authority; agile delivery practices in some units; rapid-experimentation frameworks (OKRs, sprint-based planning); communities of practice that cut across formal structure; employee-engagement initiatives that distribute decision-making; product-thinking approaches that challenge functional silos — exactly the kind of "image-of-the-future" probes that Bell (1997) places at the methodological core of futures studies, where alternative arrangements are tested in the present as a way of learning what the emerging system might require.
This sourceTwo-volume canonical text placing "images of the future" at the methodological core of futures studies; treats H2-style experimental probes in the present as a way of learning what the emerging system might require.
- H2 organizational activity includes the transitional experiments already underway: cross-functional teams with decision authority; agile delivery practices in some units; rapid-experimentation frameworks (OKRs, sprint-based planning); communities of practice that cut across formal structure; employee-engagement initiatives that distribute decision-making; product-thinking approaches that challenge functional silos — exactly the kind of "image-of-the-future" probes that Bell (1997) places at the methodological core of futures studies, where alternative arrangements are tested in the present as a way of learning what the emerging system might require.
- Wild Cards
- Wild-card analysis is standard in governmental strategic-foresight practice, in corporate futures programs, and in risk-analysis domains where structural surprise has high cost, as Bell (1997) surveys in Foundations of Futures Studies.
This sourceTwo-volume canonical text placing "images of the future" at the methodological core of futures studies; treats H2-style experimental probes in the present as a way of learning what the emerging system might require.
- Wild-card analysis is standard in governmental strategic-foresight practice, in corporate futures programs, and in risk-analysis domains where structural surprise has high cost, as Bell (1997) surveys in Foundations of Futures Studies.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 6 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:82973fc19b18 · see in the full table