On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies.¶
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306(21), 1259-1262.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Framing
- Survival vs. Mortality Framing in Healthcare.
This sourceCanonical medical framing study: survival vs. mortality framing of lung-cancer treatments shifts choices among patients, students, and physicians alike; directly supports the healthcare survival/mortality framing example.
- Survival vs. Mortality Framing in Healthcare.
Mechanisms¶
- Gain/Loss Frame Comparison
- The two sentences are numerically identical, so a gap between them is pure valence effect — the loss framing makes surgery's risk loom larger and shifts some patients toward radiation.
This sourceShows that equivalent survival-versus-mortality framing changes the relative preference for surgery over radiation therapy.
- The two sentences are numerically identical, so a gap between them is pure valence effect — the loss framing makes surgery's risk loom larger and shifts some patients toward radiation.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:82c55eb59ea3 · see in the full table