Neutral Models for the Analysis of Broad-Scale Landscape Pattern¶
Gardner, R. H., Milne, B. T., Turnei, M. G., & O'Neill, R. V. (1987). Neutral Models for the Analysis of Broad-Scale Landscape Pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1(1), 19-28.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Percolation
- Ecology. Habitat connectivity under fragmentation, and the critical fraction of preserved habitat below which a species loses continental movement corridors.
This sourceApplies percolation theory to landscapes, identifying a critical habitat fraction below which connectivity (movement corridors) collapses.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract backs the frame - percolation theory applied to landscapes, with patch number, size and shape varying with the habitat fraction p - but states nothing about connectivity, fragmentation or species movement corridors.
“We used methods derived from percolation theory to construct neutral landscape models, i.e. , models lacking effects due to topography, contagion, disturbance history, and related ecological processes. ... The analysis shows that number, size, and shape of patches changes as a function of p, the fraction of the landscape occupied by the habitat type of interest, and m, the linear dimension of the map.”
- Ecology. Habitat connectivity under fragmentation, and the critical fraction of preserved habitat below which a species loses continental movement corridors.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8329ed337332 · see in the full table