Art as Technique" ("Iskusstvo kak priyom")¶
Shklovsky, V. (1917/1965). Art as Technique" ("Iskusstvo kak priyom"). Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Defamiliarization
- In literature and the arts, the origin substrate, Shklovsky's ostranenie names art's function as the renewal of perception by making the familiar strange — Tolstoy describing property from a horse's viewpoint, Kafka's estranged bureaucracies, surrealist and absurdist disruption, and the postcolonial or feminist re-reading that strips the naturalised perspective from canonical works.
This sourceOriginates ostranenie (defamiliarization), defines art's function as restoring perception by making the familiar strange, and uses Tolstoy's horse-narrator (Kholstomer) estranging private property.
- In literature and the arts, the origin substrate, Shklovsky's ostranenie names art's function as the renewal of perception by making the familiar strange — Tolstoy describing property from a horse's viewpoint, Kafka's estranged bureaucracies, surrealist and absurdist disruption, and the postcolonial or feminist re-reading that strips the naturalised perspective from canonical works.
- Form and Content
- The content is the invariant that survives reformatting; the form is the carrier that, while swappable in principle, leaves its fingerprint on every instance.
This sourceFoundational Russian Formalist statement that literary form is a constituent of meaning, not a transparent vehicle. SUPPORTS the structural-signature claim that form is a non-neutral carrier and that each practice works one axis against the other (468, 469).
- The content is the invariant that survives reformatting; the form is the carrier that, while swappable in principle, leaves its fingerprint on every instance.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:8344b8e00df6 · see in the full table