Strategies and Considerations for the Back End of the Fuel Cycle¶
OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. (2019). Strategies and Considerations for the Back End of the Fuel Cycle. OECD Publishing.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Sequestration
- The implementation patterns below distil decades of practice that the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (2019) documents in its review of deep geological repositories, where multi-barrier design, access-gated retrievability, decay-managed timelines, and institutional-continuity protocols are jointly required for regulatory licensing.
This sourceReviews international practice in deep geological disposal across member states, documenting multi-barrier design, retrievability protocols, decay-managed timelines, and institutional-continuity arrangements as jointly required for regulatory licensing.
- The implementation patterns below distil decades of practice that the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (2019) documents in its review of deep geological repositories, where multi-barrier design, access-gated retrievability, decay-managed timelines, and institutional-continuity protocols are jointly required for regulatory licensing.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:834885c62dff · see in the full table