Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State¶
Gelman, A. (2008). Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Atomistic Fallacy
- Andrew Gelman's Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State (2008) documents the political-science version
This sourceGelman's state-level finding that the Democrats do better in richer states, with the state ordering running from poorest Mississippi to richest Connecticut.
SupportedVerified against a saved copy of the source
“Red state, blue state, rich state, poor state”
- Andrew Gelman's Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State (2008) documents the political-science version
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8543f148b589 · see in the full table