Understanding Morphology¶
Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. D. (2010). Understanding Morphology.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Morpheme
- Morphology
- … derivation — and the constraints that regulate them: morphotactics (ordering; un-friend-ly is well-formed, friend-un-ly is not), allomorphy (surface-form variation conditioned by phonological context; the English negative prefix surfaces as in-, im-, il-, ir- depending on the following segment
This sourceA morphology textbook's treatment of allomorphy as context-conditioned surface variation, with a typology of allomorphy types and their conditioning.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“representation shows no [allomorphy] at all. In many cases of phonological [allomorphy], it is evident that the”
- … derivation — and the constraints that regulate them: morphotactics (ordering; un-friend-ly is well-formed, friend-un-ly is not), allomorphy (surface-form variation conditioned by phonological context; the English negative prefix surfaces as in-, im-, il-, ir- depending on the following segment
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:85f98d4fdd72 · see in the full table